On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 12:55:56AM +0300, Paul Davis wrote: > actually i wasn't thinking of editing as much as mixing. you can remember > the solo, mute, gain, and FX state of a moderately sized session in your > head without a visual reminder? Sure. As can every audio engineer who has done his share of live mixing. Of course on a 'real' mixer some settings are visible, but if you depend on that you'll be in trouble before you know it - at least if you're dealing with 30+ channels. Much of that depends on ergonomic design of the mixer, which is what sets the real top class apart from the rest. In my experience Neve was the best at that - you could reach for any control and have the right one every time, even when the the only lights were the level meters and a candle or two, as was often the case. I *do* remember the first time I had to do anything on this scale 'on air' - it was quite scary. Studio 1 in Brussels, big band, 20 or so players + solos, Harrison console, live broadcast and 24-track recording. All levels carefully set before turned out wrong because the band had been drinking between the rehearsal and the concert, and they were 'in the mood'. But after a few times you get your grips on the situation and you can relax. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
