On 08/04/14 07:55, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Fons Adriaensen<fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:57:03PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
If you are in a position to rely on the screen, you have no reason to
become adept at remembering all those details. The converse also holds.
[... ]
It depends probably on the kind of editing you want to do.
If it isn't too complex (such as moving fragments in time
AND between tracks at the same time while keeping those
tracks aligned), it surely can be done without having the
visual representation.
actually i wasn't thinking of editing as much as mixing. you can remember
the solo, mute, gain, and FX state of a moderately sized session in your
head without a visual reminder?
it depends on what you are practiced at, in a different but related field ...
plotting lighting cues in a theatre ... it is very common to be the designer and
have someone else operating the desk, then keeping large sets of channel numbers
and existing states in your head makes it a lot quicker and easier to
communicate as you walk around the space. Casual observers find this dialogue
very strange. Interestingly operating audio you often look down at the desk,
operating lights the effect is visual and not looking at the desk is important.
editing is actually easier for many cases precisely for the reasons you
outlined.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
