Re: Bitwig: what we can learn from it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/31/2014 12:33 PM, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:23:15PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> On 03/30/2014 03:10 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
>> 
>>> My conclusion so far is that Bitwig gives you what Linuxaudio
>>> lack too often, smooth workflow and 'completeness' of features.
>>> This is a major thing for people who want to make music!
>> 
>> only for some kind of music.
>> 
>> Bitwig is just a toy compared to for example Csound and
>> Supercollider.
>> 
> 
> But Csound and Supercollider are not suitable for making music.
> They're fine if you're some kind of autistic savant computer
> genius, but utterly fucking useless if you're a musician.
> 

It really depends what you think is music and what style you like and
want to make.

I recently saw an amazing performance of four opera singers +
supercollider (+ some python, set with lilypond, etc etc) All of them
musicians. Genius, yes.  Autistic savant computer genius, no.
http://www.ensemble101.fr/  blew me away.

2c,
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux