On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 22:09 +1100, Patrick Shirkey wrote: > So everyone uses darkice instead of ices for jack support? There is very > little mention of that option in the search results that turned up for me > and nothing in the official icecast documentation. Never said "everyone". But I guess I must've compiled darkice myself back when I used it, or I just streamed Ogg Vorbis. Most people I know doing this stuff just pirate a copy of SAM Broadcaster. > > Most likely because it's not written. You could provide a patch rather > > than complain about probably imaginary politics. > > That doesn't make sense as supposedly the ices-kh package has been around > for a while and is even included in Arch Linux. So why do *I* need to > write a new patch when the ices-kh repo already has or had support at some > point? The usual reason for something not being there is that it does not exist yet. Apologies for not bothering to research your issue more. > Surely the icecast people are aware of the kh package(s)? Let's say for > the sake of argument that hte kh codebase is considered inferior for some > reason does anyone know if there a specific reason that officially > sanctioned JACK support is not already included in the official ices > codebase? Why don't you ask them? > Is this another one of those JACK vs PA vs Android vs Icecast vs ...? Probably imaginary politics. -- Peter Nelson <peter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user