On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Max <abonnements@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And maybe because they want tighter integration than can "easily" be reached with PD ?Am 2014년 01월 22일 22:35, schrieb Paul Davis:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Max <abonnements@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:abonnements@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:I wasn't suggesting that is is trivial. I was only wondering why they
>
> the modular system also teased for the next version is strange too. I
> wish they'd just incorporate Pd into Bitwig. Who needs Max for
> Live then.
>
>
> oh sure. "just incorpate" it. one of the biggest engineering efforts
> in Live's history, and you want them "just" do it.
>
> it would be cool, though.
want to reinvent the wheel rather than making use of something that is
already there (and in BSD license). This is the screenshot from their
site and their patching environment:
http://bitwig.com/dms/bitwig/img/announcement_page/sections/2/native-modular-system.png
Maybe for the same reasons that led to Ingen or AlsaModularSynth or Reaktor or ... ?
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
