On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:45:03 +0000 Q <lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My point was, there is nothing inherently polite/rude about either > posting style. However, bottom-posting IS very inconvenient to read. > If trimming is so important and bottom-posting breaks without it, why > quote ANYTHING at all. > > After all, what's quoted in bottom-posting is incomplete chunks and > no longer a full record of all that's gone before (which isn't an > issue that top-posting by design has to have), which makes it even > more inconvenient, because if you need context you have to flick > backwards and forwards between different messages to get the full > picture. > > The arguments in favour of bottom-posting are illogical. How would you respond to several distinct parts of a longish mail in your top-posting style? Regards, Philipp _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
