Re: Somebody here using: Phasex configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/04/13 01:26, Len Ovens wrote:

On Sun, April 7, 2013 4:47 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I like the sound of Phasex, but never used it. I don't remember why I
never used it, but Perhaps I always run into this issue. I'm already
annoyed by all those apps, were I have to manually load the settings
after starting them by a script, but at least I can store and load
settings for those apps. If this doesn't work, an app IMO is completely
useless.

It does have some interesting sounds. If I want those sounds I will use
it, but I am not much of a keyboards person and so tend not to experiment
in that area as much.

It definitely has some unique features: the delays are fun, for instance, because they can be modulated by LFOs, and it's also one of the few softsynths I know of (the only one I can think of off-hand for Linux, in fact) that can take audio input and run it through its filter/envelopes, much like many hardware synths can. That opens up some interesting possibilities.

It takes a lot to get me to use an external JACK softsynth these days, though -- I rarely even use Hydrogen any more. If it's not a plugin (preferably LV2, though native VST will do in a pinch), I'm pretty unlikely to use it, unless it's the only option available to get the result I'm after.

Thanks
Leigh


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux