Re: OT: what is happening with RT kernel development?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:00:15 +0100, <jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Le 29-03-2013 17:55, Harry van Haaren a écrit :

jonetsu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Are the low latency kernels just another term for real-time kernels ?
No they are different. For almost all use-cases the low-latency kernel
is enough, the RT kernels are oriented towards hard real-time
performance. The low latency kernel is capable of at least down to
2ms.. that is probably low enough for your use case?

Could be, I don't know. This is about recording one instrument at a time in Ardour, basically.


As long as you are not doing software monitoring (i.e. listening to what you are recording through Ardour, while recording it), you don't need low latency at all, and might not need anything beyond linux-generic.

If you do software monitoring, linux-lowlatency may well be more than enough.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux