On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 08:09 -0500, Rob wrote: > On 02/22/2013 03:47 AM, david wrote: > >>>> dwm has both idiosyncrasies and a learning curve, but so too do most > >>>> "expert" pieces of software. vim and emacs are the canonical examples, > > Being hard to learn doesn't make something an "expert" piece of software - > > unless you're talking about a *field* that requires lots of expertise such > > as rocket science. Text editing isn't rocket science. A text editor > > shouldn't be as hard to learn as rocket science. ;-) > > What makes something an "expert" piece of software is simply that it's not > aimed at the layman. vi, emacs and dwm were meant for software developers > and system administrators to use. And a musician who's also one of those > things will probably be able to figure out those programs. A musician who > isn't should probably use leafpad or something like that. Anything more > involved and they're not going to be able to figure out how to turn on > syntax highlighting, regular expression search and replace, autocompletion, > etc. anyway. > > Text editing isn't rocket science, but when vi and emacs were originally > written, it was computer science. Since then it's just been 30-40 years of > iteration to make them more capable without much thought to whether someone > accustomed to Windows Notepad could use them. I've used both for about 25 > years, and have no use for the (to me ill-advised) menu extensions that > don't really help noobs use them while taking up space on my screen that > could be used for one or two more lines of code. > > For those poor laymen who have to edit files from the command line, we have > nano now. I still get questions from people who allegedly have degrees in > my field about functions that are prominently displayed in its little menu > at the bottom of the screen. Instead of reading the screen, they've been > trained to look for File/Save. > > Software meant for the layman but that's difficult to use, on the other > hand, is just poorly-written software. (Expert software can be bad too, > but usually that doesn't last 30 years.) > > Rob I'm not accustomed to Windows editors, in the past I used all kinds of complicated editors, such as the first C64 Assembler editors, C editors for DR DOS etc., but today I expect more comfort. I'm not aware about syntax highlighting for Leafpad or that it can be used by the command line. I neither program professional, nor just for interest, but I need a command line editor to set up *NIX systems and for doing this I expect an intuitive to use editor, such as mcedit. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
