On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 17:24 -0800, Len Ovens wrote: > > dwm has both idiosyncrasies and a learning curve, but so too do most > > "expert" pieces of software. vim and emacs are the canonical examples, > > I never did get anywhere with those two. Ed and Vi mostly, though I think > I have forgotten most of it. I found joe and used it ever after... it's > still my main CLI text ed. I use vi(m), if nothing else should be available. Should I make yet another joke about emacs ;)? When searching for a MUA I once chose "wanderlust", because I like the name. It's a mail client for emacs. To like the name of an application isn't enough to use it forever. I preferred mcedit, but during setting up a new Arch install I used nano, because regarding to a font and mcedit's default colors the fonts are more readable. Even for the GUI I've given up gedit, while I still install it. From FreeBSD I wanted to edit a Linux, so I started "gksu gedit", but I got no write access, then I became root and used another editor and I could edit Linux. I tend to drop applications that can't be started by root, but only when running "gksu" and co. For nano I'm missing highlighting, but I already read that it is possible to get it for nano too. Half-OT: I don't get the Xfce4 issues others and I get for Ubuntu Quantal, for my Arch Linux install. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
