On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:13:02PM +0100, Kjetil Matheussen wrote: > Paul Davis: > > >if you're not willing to participate in the managed handling of a > >bug, i'm not interested in your bug. 'Your bug' is a bit missing the point. It's the author's bug, not the user's. > If there is a bug in my software, I want people to report it any way > they like (as long as it's electronically). Bug reports should always > be appreciated. I think/hope this goes for many other developers. It's certainly like that here. A bugtracker is a tool used by a developer or a team much in the same way as an electronic or paper agenda is. If I want a meeting with some person I'll call him/her or maybe his/her secretary. I don't write myself into his/her agenda or todo- list. If some project gets a bug report via email or a mailing list it's a simple matter for a developer to enter it into the bug tracker of his/her choice. Or write it down on a post-it (TM). It probably takes less time than reading, evaluating and assigning it, which has to be done anyway. Ciao, -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
