Re: So what do you think sucks about Linux audio ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/06/2013 05:19 PM, hermann meyer wrote:
Am 06.02.2013 16:49, schrieb Al Thompson:
I had to laugh at this.  Every once in a while, I will search to see if
there are any new LADSPA or LV2 plugins.  I often see plugins described
by their mathematical function, with NO hint of what it actually does.
If linux audio would like to get its foot in the door with guitarists,
defining available plugins only by math function is not the way to go
about it.  It almost seems like some plugins exists only because they
were someone's class assignment (write a plugin using FFT).
Usually I wouldn't answer on this topic, even if I have some concerns,
but I will repeat on this.
Because my last announcements here on this list was exactly about LV2
plug-ins for guitarist which indeed use at least FFT.
This release introduce the first LV2 plugs created from the guitarix

Whilst being a standalone project (i.e not a DAW/authoring tool) this is one linux audio project which seems really committed to interoperability. Its a huge effort to develop this way.

A question someone asked a thread or two back, do you suffer from not enough feedback from users?




_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux