Re: guitarix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 04.02.2013 08:37, schrieb hermann meyer:
Am 02.02.2013 20:23, schrieb Jeremy Jongepier:
On 02/02/2013 01:21 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi *!


today, i checked out guitarix for the first time, while working on a
clean guitar track that needed some cojonification. built straight from
git w/o issues (except for the fact that it does require a ladspa header
even if explicitly asked not build ladspa plugins).


That's because guitarix is a ladspa host as well, so the ladspa headers are required even when you disable the build of the ladspa plugs.

Ah, well, I just checked that we have disable the check for the ladspa header when --no-ladspa is used, indeed a bug, I have correct it now in GIT, thanks for the hint. ( Even if it takes me a while to understand what you mean :-) , my foul)

greets
hermann
after two hours of experimenting, i feel compelled to share my impression:

    FUCK YEAH!

many thanks for sharing this awesome tool.

best,


jörn

I'm glad to hear you found it useful. :-)

greets
hermann


Good stuff ey?
I'm working on my workshop application for LAC2013, using your electric guitar with Linux audio. Starring guitarix of course :)

Jeremy

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux