On Sun, January 13, 2013 8:59 pm, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 04:11:33PM -0500, Brett McCoy wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Chris Bannister >> <cbannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 09:53:45AM -0800, Len Ovens wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, January 13, 2013 9:51 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> >> > I suspect >> >> > we are still monkeys. >> >> >> >> Good thing you said monkeys, Apes are smart enough to be insulted... >> > >> > Just to nitpick here, but we are closer to chimpanzees than apes or >> > monkeys, in fact apparently, chimpanzees are more closely related to >> us >> > than apes or monkeys. >> >> Chimpanzees *are* apes! > > Ahh %$#@, for some stupid reason I was thinking of gibbons and orangutans > and > gorillas. > > Huge apologies Len! None needed. In the context I wasn't saying one mammal was closer to human than the other, just that monkeys are not very bright.... maybe that makes them closer to human after all. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
