Re: ffmpeg or libav

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Here's is the relevant Debian maintainers explanation of why he chose libav over ffmpeg:

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2011-December/023070.html

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Rustom Mody <rustompmody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ive seen some postings here recently recommending ffmpeg, so I thought I'd ask this (somewhat political) question:
All that I know is that as an ordinary mostly-ignoramus user, Ive used ffmpeg on and off and then one day my debian updates told me ffmpeg is obsolete use libav.
Did that and have found that some things that used to work with ffmpeg stopped with libav (dont exactly remember the details).
Currently it appears that for using ffmpeg one needs to compile from source.

Since people are recommending use of ffmpeg am I to understand that the headache is worth it?

http://blog.pkh.me/p/13-the-ffmpeg-libav-situation.html seems to say that ffmpeg is integrating libav patches and not vice versa

[Sorry for asking a political question]

Rusi

--
http://www.the-magus.in
http://blog.languager.org


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux