Re: Pro Audio? OT rant.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> > Given that most audio interfaces will perform better at 48 kHz than at
> > 44.1

http://xkcd.com/285/

I've always had fine results running my Delta1010s at 44.1kHz, since I
only do audio destined for CD and wanted to avoid the re-sampling.
Why would running them at 48kHz make them perform better?

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
 Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux