On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 12:44 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf > <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 09:19 -0800, Len Ovens wrote: > > On Sat, December 22, 2012 7:42 am, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 14:58 +0000, John Murphy wrote: > > >> Synth manufacturers: Why no ADAT out? > > > > > > Would be nice for homestudios today, assumed there would > be cheap cards > > > with several ADAT inputs. My RME card only has got one > ADAT, that btw. > > > does not work with Linux. > > > and what card would that be? RME HDSPe AIO > ADAT can do 48KHz, 96KHz and 192KHz. Nobody will use 44.1KHz > for > pro-audio, so that wouldn't cause an issue. > > the usual ralph misinformation. does it ever stop? > > ADAT supports 44.1kHz and 48kHz as-is. With the S-Mux "standard", it > can route 88.2kHz and 96kHz signals, but each channel is split across > two ADAT channels, causing a 50% reduction in the number of available > channels. Can you give an example for misinformation by me? http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013570.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-multimedia/2012-November/013572.html Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
