On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 20:23 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:05:44PM -0800, J. Liles wrote: > > > You're not likely to get any respect from this community unless/until you > > release your source code under a free/libre license. Who have spent decades > > and 10's of thousands of hours working on projects that we give away freely > > and openly, your software is irrelevant and your request for respect is > > borderline insulting. > > If anything is 'borderline insulting' it's IMHO the above. > > While I can't imagine any good reason for keeping mixer4 source > code closed, the only consequence this should (and will) bring > is the reduced amount of support the author will get from this > (LAU/LAD) community. It should not be any pretext for ad-hominem > comments. And don't forget that many on this list are using things > like Mixbus. Is Harrison 'borderline insulting' as well ? +1 We are living in a free world. I prefer open source, but if somebody has what ever reason not to open the source code, I can decide if I'll use it or not, no need for that noise. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
