-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: looking for command-line/scriptable mastering software Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:40:52 +0100 On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 12:05 -0800, J. Liles wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Grekim <grekimj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > [snip] > > It's too bad the closed source issue has rubbed you guys the > wrong way. The way I see it, I've invested well over 1000 > hours and a year of work on something which I ask nothing for > in return except maybe a little respect now and then :) > > > You're not likely to get any respect from this community unless/until > you release your source code under a free/libre license. Who have > spent decades and 10's of thousands of hours working on projects that > we give away freely and openly, your software is irrelevant and your > request for respect is borderline insulting. If you're truly proud of > what you've created, then show it to the world. You're not getting the > feedback you want because no one wants to run your mysterious binary > blob, and I don't blame them. You're never going to strike it rich > with this software, so the only legitimate reason you could possibly > have for not sharing the source code is that you're ashamed of what a > mess it is. It's stupid not to share knowledge. Secret recipes are from another time. If people don't want to share their knowledge, e.g. good or bad code, it's ok, valuation is stupid too. Close source code for a open source community is absurd, OTOH the open source community tends to be dogmatic and to evaluate others often by exaggerated opinions of them self and prejudices. AFAIK the community does like LinuxDSP and AFAIK they give away binary blobs only, I might be mistaken. It has a lot to do with aversion and devotion. Two people can say the same, or by a misunderstanding somebody does think person A said something, but person B said it. The rating isn't neutral, but sentimental. Respect has to do with group behaviour only, not with knowledge or something like that. It's simple dogmatism, nothing more. Such noise is typical for some Linux lists. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
