Julien Claassen <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Eric! > If you have any questions about Nama/Ecasound, just shoot! This > weekend I will be a little busy, but when I'm in, I'll have a look > for e-mail. Thanks for the offer! I haven't gotten a chance to look more closely at Nama, but am thinking more about what I want based on my existing workflow. I like using makefiles because I can make small edits to code, and when I run "make", it'll only rebuild the part of a project which changed. To restate my original question: For editing audio files, I'd like a workflow similar to how I hack on C projects: I edit code and run "make". I edit more code, and run "make" again... Each invocation of "make" only builds the parts of the project that's changed in the past. I also didn't realize this earlier: there is a lot of functionality from SoX that have grown on me in the past few months which I've grown very accustomed and dependent on :) If I continue using SoX, I will definitely combine it with ecasound to fill the gaps SoX has (e.g. LADSPA/LV2 support). _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
