On Sun, October 28, 2012 1:50 pm, Paul Davis wrote: >> There are some things that could happen to pulse that would make it work >> a >> lot better with Jack... when pulse finds out jack is taking away one of >> it's hardware ports, it would be really nice if pulse transferred all >> it's >> settings for that port to the jack sink/source ports. > > > > i am not sure that the d-bus based reservation scheme identifies who is > asking to take control. i could be wrong. Ya, but if I loose a port and also get a jack-sink that says a lot too. Pulse should be able when it detects jack-sink/source be looking for what port is configured that it no longer has access to. On the other hand, I would be happy if the jackbridge could be set as default whenever it shows up and if the module that detects jack would at least pass parameters to the two modules (source/sink) such as number of channels and naming. If Pulse finds a port blocked that it is sending a stream to, it could look for the new default and switch the stream there. I wish my coding skills were at a place I could patch it. -- Len Ovens www.OvenWerks.net _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
