On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:51:11 -0400 Brett McCoy <idragosani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST) > > "Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all > >> the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform > >> over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of > >> the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the > >> courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list. > > > > I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management. > > My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it > > have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio > > subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I > > don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system > > has been very stable for years now. > > AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you > shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much > stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to > make that much of an impact on it. :-) What I find extremely disappointing about all of this is that we are not exactly over-endowed with developers. Without casting stones in any directions this entire issue is a waste of talent and potential advancement. -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
