On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Joe Hartley <jh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:19:02 +0200 (CEST) > "Patrick Shirkey" <pshirkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> IMO Paul was right to come out full guns blazing on this one. After all >> the effort that has gone into making Linux the most stable audio platform >> over the years it is very dubious behaviour for this person to come out of >> the blue with a direct challenge to the platform without even having the >> courtesy to discuss it first in the LAD list. > > I found it odd that the klang developer has this thing for power management. > My studio machine is not a laptop running on battery power, nor does it > have a heat problem. I really couldn't care less about whether my audio > subsystem allows the CPU to throttle back. My latency is around 5ms, and I > don't have any problem with routing apps through JACK. My studio system > has been very stable for years now. AFAIK, if you have your cpu governor set to 'performance', you shouldn't have an issue with frequency scaling anyway. I have so much stuff consuming power in my studio as it is, I doubt Jack is going to make that much of an impact on it. :-) -- Brett W. McCoy -- http://www.brettwmccoy.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden; If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world." -- Jelaleddin Rumi _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
