Re: klang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem to
>> react to your arguments. Maybe not yet.
>>
> I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess
> you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the
> end of KLANG then!"
>
> Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest?

I don't think this is about the Internet so much, and nor is it a
pissing match. The guy basically came out and said *everything* in
linux audio is broken, and the only way to fix it is to start
everything from scratch. With everything in life, if you take an
extreme position you should expect extreme responses, and also be
prepared to back up your claims.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux