On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:14:55 +0400 Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I did not say that, those are your words. I am interested in the discussion. > Paul has put forward some serious argument. I wonder if the guy will > respond to them, that's all. > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Thanks. Following, although I must say the author of KLANG does not seem > > to > > > react to your arguments. Maybe not yet. > > > > > I find it disturbing in the extreme to read comments such as "I guess > > you embarrassed datenwolf to the point he will not respond. That's the > > end of KLANG then!" > > > > Seriously? Does everything on the Internet need to be a pissing contest? > > It is a problem of style and pride. AFAIK not even once Datenwolf responsed in the line with "yes, I have not thought about this yet. Let me think how I can address this problem" but instead he acts like he has everything figured out and knows all problems and solutions. That is no discussion, it is a poor defense. For me thats a(nother) hint that he does indeed not know much and is pretentious. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
