Re: FireWire audio on Linux: past, present and future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I don't know, haven't tried one. My laptop has Firewire 400 port on it. The sound tech for my church used a Firewire adapter to connect to our Firewire audio device. It worked fine with his Thinkpad and Windows XP until the card socket on the Thinkpad died. He replaced his Thinkpad with an HP running Windows 7, and the Firewire adapter doesn't work at all. Apparently the XP driver won't work on Windows 7, and there's no Windows 7 driver for the adapter.

I've tried to use it with my laptop's Firewire port, but we haven't been able to make it work yet. We never have enough time to troubleshoot and figure out why it's not working. It's possible I have a junk Firewire chip on this laptop. :-(

I need to talk with our electronics tech about pulling the Firewire audio out of the rack, so I can take it home and try working out the problems.

On 06/16/2012 08:35 AM, Neil wrote:

Are FireWire 400/800 combo host adapters still contra-indicated?

On Jun 15, 2012 1:46 PM, "david" <gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 06/15/2012 04:46 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:

        On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Dave Phillips wrote:

            Excellent article/interviews. However, it ignores a rather
            salient
            development - the gradual disappearance of Firewire from
            desktop and laptop
            machines. The last time I shopped I was surprised to see
            that FW, like PCI,
            is becoming rare hardware, presumably due to improved
            performance from USB3
            (?).


        It's rather because of USB2 stack on WIndows becoming more solid.
        There were times when some M-Audio's USB2 interfaces couldn't be
        used
        on Windows at all due to IRQ collisions. A friend of mine gave up on
        one and exchanged it to a FireWire interface some 6 or 7 years ago,
        and that was quite common.

        So, I thought about this, but then again I couldn't find much
        info on
        actual rejection of FireWire by vendors as in numbers, stats
        etc. So I
        thought I'd rather skip it.

        Thunderbolt is an interesting approach, but I've yet to see a single
        audio interface for real work, not fun, using it.

            Otherwise a fine piece. Thanks for the pointer, Alex !


        You are welcome :)

        Alexandre Prokoudine
        http://libregraphicsworld.org


    The real reason for vendor rejection of Firewire is the higher cost
    of licensing Firewire vs USB. Margins on hardware are almost
    non-existent, so every little bit of cost lowered helps.

--
David
gnome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
authenticity, honesty, community
http://clanjones.org/david/
http://dancing-treefrog.deviantart.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux