On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:25:37PM -0300, Bernardo Barros wrote: > 2011/7/15 Renato <rennabh@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I second that... I'm by no means an expert of programming languages, > > but sclang/sc really seems inconsistent and sort of messed up. I mean, > > it is *good* because you can easily do many non trivial things, but it > > could be much better organized IMHO > > > > > Some criticisms are related to the possibilities of using different > syntax for the same job, unlike Python where one job has one syntax. > etc.. This a valid criticism and was discussed a while ago in the > sc-dev. But you can't really changes this kind of stuff without > breaking old code, what you can do is to define a recommended style to > people to follow. > > If you really hate sclang you can still use SuperCollider (scsynth) > from Haskell (hsc3) or Scala (scalacollider), two modern and very > successful languages. Neither of them I find attractive. I don't like Java and functional languages don't like me. PyCollider would be nice... Ciao, -- FA _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
