On 1 July 2011 14:48, James Morris <jwm.art.net@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Petri-Foo does not support layers within a patch, but does support >>> multiple patches in a bank. Each patch is independent from any other >>> patch and there's no sharing or any other form of communication >>> between patches. You can set a number of patches to receive MIDI data >>> on the same channel as a hackish way around layering. >>> >>> Samples sharing the same patch has entered my mind as something for >>> the future of Petri-Foo but I'm unsure about how it could/would/should >>> work yet. >>> >> >> Hi, I see, but so it's not possible to trigger different samples with >> different velocities? Like sample1 if velocity is 0-60 and sample2 if >> velocity is 61-127 > > There's the hackish way, where both samples will always play, but one > can be quiet while the other is loud. You just need to apply the > velocity sensing to the amplitude in the correct way. But note that > there's no threshold value, it's a smooth rampage of amplitudes. Only > at the extremities will one sample be heard and not the other; mid > points will cause both to be heard to varying degrees. great example of why i need users to report things which don't work. > >> that would be great to be implemented somehow :) > > I'm reluctant to state anything definite about the implementation of > such functionality. On the one hand it is a missing feature but on the > other, I'm not sure it would fit. There are a lot of other jobs much > higher in my priorities. > > For example, while the capability to route MIDI CC increases > flexibility, the ability to turn things on/off (ie portamento) was > sacrificed, so restoring that kind of functionality is next on the > agenda and will also pave the way I hope for further capabilities in > other areas. > > Cheers, > James. > > >> cheers >> renato >> > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
