On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:41:10 +0100 James Morris <jwm.art.net@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30 June 2011 09:26, Renato <rennabh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:54:36 +0100 > > James Morris <jwm.art.net@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hello hello, > >> > >> The second official source code release Petri-Foo is now available. > > > > Hello, two little questions, does it support jack_session and is it > > possible to create layers like in hydrogen (wasn't ever able to do > > it but I think I read somewhere there was some sort of hackish way > > around it) - because for the rest I find it superior to hydrogen as > > a sampler > > Hi Renato, > > Thanks for the interest. Yes, it does support jack_session, but has > not received extensive testing by users yet (or there's no problems to > report!). > > Petri-Foo does not support layers within a patch, but does support > multiple patches in a bank. Each patch is independent from any other > patch and there's no sharing or any other form of communication > between patches. You can set a number of patches to receive MIDI data > on the same channel as a hackish way around layering. > > Samples sharing the same patch has entered my mind as something for > the future of Petri-Foo but I'm unsure about how it could/would/should > work yet. > Hi, I see, but so it's not possible to trigger different samples with different velocities? Like sample1 if velocity is 0-60 and sample2 if velocity is 61-127 that would be great to be implemented somehow :) cheers renato _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
