Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >> As per subject. This is hard to trace for me because they are put in a >> "spam" folder in the webmail interface which I hardly ever use. >> >> One of thes is e.g: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> ISP says this is correctly marked as spam because it doesn't have >> "standard features routing / resolution / related to domain" (I'm >> translating this from Italian. And in a further email that they check >> "correct routing of the sender in relation to DNS domain and not only >> reverse etc." (again my translation). >> >> Any mail-admin guru have an idea about this? > Not a mail admin guru, but it seems linuxaudio.org does not > have an SPF record. See: > > http://www.openspf.org/ > > It also doesn't use DKIM: > > http://www.dkim.org/ > > Personally I find that DKIM is a far less reliable spam/non-spam > indicator than SPF. > >> Of course it would help if they simply had an option to whitelist >> addresses ("this is not spam") or something similar which they seem not >> to have. > It would also help if you get the ISP to specifically > point to which technology they expect. I know, but that's all I got and I don't expect more after various email. Anyway thanks for the info. Lorenzo. > Erik _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
