Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> As per subject. This is hard to trace for me because they are put in a
> "spam" folder in the webmail interface which I hardly ever use.
>
> One of thes is e.g: linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ISP says this is correctly marked as spam because it doesn't have
> "standard features routing / resolution / related to domain" (I'm
> translating this from Italian. And in a further email that they check
> "correct routing of the sender in relation to DNS domain and not only
> reverse etc." (again my translation).
>
> Any mail-admin guru have an idea about this?
Not a mail admin guru, but it seems linuxaudio.org does not
have an SPF record. See:
http://www.openspf.org/
It also doesn't use DKIM:
http://www.dkim.org/
Personally I find that DKIM is a far less reliable spam/non-spam
indicator than SPF.
> Of course it would help if they simply had an option to whitelist
> addresses ("this is not spam") or something similar which they seem not
> to have.
It would also help if you get the ISP to specifically
point to which technology they expect.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
