Thank you very much David, I will really consider your comments, 100% agree that the bass should be more present (among other things) and the drums should be improved also. I really want to thank all of you for your comments. That's what exactly what I was looking for. Diego 2011/6/12 David Adler <david.jo.adler@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Diego, > > Thanks for posting this. While agreeing with Attes comment, I do really like it. > > The panned hi hats would sound more spatial if they weren't panned > totally left/right. > > Until about 1:18, the base sounds so cheap and choppy (as Julian > said). Maybe a bit of decay and release would improve it. After the > said time this becomes less annoying since the base merges with the > rest, and the nice part begins (glad I was patient enough to listen > through this first minute). > > I would not add compression except for the very low end, to push it > somewhat up. It seems to be the case that electronic music I regard as > well produced often looks over-compressed in waveform display, until > you zoom in and discover that it is just the fundamental bass > frequency periodically using up most of the dynamic range. Behind a > ~80Hz high-pass filter, dynamics often well exceed the k14 range in > jkmeter. > The very opposite of californication-style compression, in that the > result requires good playback systems. > > Just a laymans taste, have fun producing! > > > best, > d > _______________________________________________ > Linux-audio-user mailing list > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
