Re: New beta Renoie 2.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm not sure how relevant this is to the thread, but I've found the
Renoise devs to be extremely responsive and helpful when I've
contacted them about programming topics.

And yeah, as someone mentioned above, Renoise's level of stability and
overall quality of the software is exceptional, and I think it's
terrific that it's available (and maintained!) for Linux.

Louis

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Atte Andrà Jensen <atte@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/19/2011 08:51 PM, torbenh wrote:
>
>> ???
>> my normal reaction to people pointing fingers at jack is fixing their
>> code. i cant do that in this case.
>> i am just not convinced, that there is a bug in jacks transport
>> implementation.
>>
>> jack-transport has weaknesses, but these are not relevant in this case.
>
> I'm sorry for the comment, then. My appologies!
>
> In any case it would be great to get the transport problem fixed in renoise,
> and of course you're right it's the renoise devs responsibility to locate
> the problem.
>
> --
> Atte
>
> http://atte.dk  http://modlys.dk
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux