Re: Jack problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:04:07AM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 February 2011 08:43:38 Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
> > On 02/01/2011 01:02 AM, torbenh wrote:
> > > maybe your using 100 in it. that doesnt work. use 99
> > 
> > Hello Torben,
> > 
> > I've searched for more info about this but I couldn't find anywhere that
> > 100 might be an invalid setting. Do you have more info on this, a link
> > maybe?
> 
> Priority 100 is the absolute max on Linux. When you use that, nothing else 
> will stop jack in case of errors. And nothing else has a chance to run, not 
> even interrupts handlers for hardware.

we are only talking about ulimit here.
and 99 is the max. not 100

we had one user in irc who had 100 in his limits.conf
and pam failed to set the ulimit in that case.



> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


-- 
torben Hohn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux