2011/1/12 allcoms <allcoms@xxxxxxxxx>
liquorix it's not RT but -ck (con kolivas)
pengutronix and 64studio both worked fine
BTW I am on debian testing from ages and always roll my own RT kernel (2.6.33.7.2-rt30 actually) which works fine.
No benchmarking with cyclic test and other stuffs though.
There's a thread on debian kernel develeper mailing list started by Grammostola Rosea
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2009-March/003404.html
Just read this thread from start to finish but its not answered my question which is 'What is the best rt kernel package for squeeze?' - is there anyone on here who has done any kind of benchmarking or testing of the the liquorix, penguintronix and 64studio kernel packages? If not then I'd be happy to hear from on of the kernel experts which one appears to have the optimal config.
liquorix it's not RT but -ck (con kolivas)
pengutronix and 64studio both worked fine
BTW I am on debian testing from ages and always roll my own RT kernel (2.6.33.7.2-rt30 actually) which works fine.
No benchmarking with cyclic test and other stuffs though.
I think it was Robin who posted the apt line to get the latest 64 studio squeeze kernel- I was looking for that recently yet failed to find it as it doesn't seem to be mentioned on the 64studio page so could you please add a link to that (maybe on the 'Upgrades' page) 64studio crew?
Does anyone know the reason behind there being no 'official' RT kernel in the Debian repos?
There's a thread on debian kernel develeper mailing list started by Grammostola Rosea
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/2009-March/003404.html
regards
--
L'unica speranza di catarsi, ammesso che ne esista una, resta affidata all'istinto di ribellione, alla rivolta non isterilita in progetti, alla protesta violenta e viscerale.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
