On 01/07/2011 10:18 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/07/2011 10:03 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:44 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix:
AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel,
but my
results have been very positive:
http://liquorix.net/
ymmv. my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel
over
all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux
audio landscape.
The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio
kernel, had to change the apt line though:
deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main
contrib
non-free
Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid?
No, although there's some minor effort for Maverick.
Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64.
Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change
again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out.
Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join
Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour.
Ok, I'm interested in your view about that kernel.
It is not released yet and there's no ETA.
Is it good practice to install a debian kernel for Lucid?
It should not make a difference. The only thing is you won't get
automatic updates.
Or it should be a special repo for the kernel... Then updates should
be possible.
Robin,
Would that be possible? To put the highly praised 64studio RT kernel in
a special repo, so it's easier to use on other and different systems,
without having to install / upgrade all the 64studio packages?
Would be cool.
Thanks in advance,
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
