On 01/07/2011 09:44 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: > On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote: >> On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: >>> On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote: >>>> Hi Jeremy, >>>> >>>> On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: >>>>> On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote: >>>>>> in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix: >>>>>> AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel, but my >>>>>> results have been very positive: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://liquorix.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> ymmv. my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel >>>>>> over >>>>>> all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux >>>>>> audio landscape. >>>>> The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio >>>>> kernel, had to change the apt line though: >>>>> >>>>> deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main contrib >>>>> non-free >>> Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid? >> No, although there's some minor effort for Maverick. >> >> Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64. >> Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change >> again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out. >> >> Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join >> Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour. > Ok, I'm interested in your view about that kernel. It is not released yet and there's no ETA. > Is it good practice to install a debian kernel for Lucid? It should not make a difference. The only thing is you won't get automatic updates. 2c, robin -- Robin Gareus web: http://gareus.org/ mail: robin@xxxxxxxxxx lab: http://citu.fr/ chat: xmpp:rgareus@xxxxx Public Key at http://pgp.mit.edu/ http://gareus.org/public.asc Fingerprint : 7107 840B 4DC9 C948 076D 6359 7955 24F1 4F95 2B42 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
