On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 06:41 +0000, andy baxter wrote: > On 07/01/11 00:29, Robin Gareus wrote: > >> If so, it might be a bit clearer for people not used to the academic > >> thing if you changed the wording on the web page to make this obvious. > > Thanks for bringing this up. I'll look into it tomorrow. > > > > Maybe it's the term "Camera ready" [1] that's somewhat confusing. > > I think I'll just remove that since it's basically an internal deadline > > and I'll add a note that papers should be as complete as possible when > > being submitted. > > P.S. I think the bit that confused me is just that there are two > deadlines listed for papers to be submitted - the January 15th one and > the 'camera ready papers' one. What would help is if you said a bit more > clearly what the submission and review process actually entails, rather > than just listing the deadlines. Isn't this just common practices for academic conferences, however? All those I've been to (in the Engineering and Computer Science fields) have similar terminology. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
