Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 15:00:06 -0500 Jeremy <jeremybubs@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Fabio <capoeirista@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:48:07 -0500 > > Jeremy <jeremybubs@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > It seems like you would want to do normal compression with a very > > > low threshold (about the noise level) and a negative ratio. > > > > > > then you end up with a curve like > > > > > > \ > > > / \ > > > / \ > > > > > > Then you can add that into your original signal, to get something > > > approximating "upward compression". > > > > > > Also, perhaps the expander from tap-plugins might do what you > > > want: http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html > > > > > > <http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html>Jeremy > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Fabio <capoeirista@xxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:09:54 +0000 > > > > Q <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > > > > > upwards compression does it by boosting the volume of the > > > > > quietest signals -- compressing from the bottom up. This > > > > > parallel processing produces upwards compression as Joern > > > > > expounded on my original statement > > > > > > > > ok, thats what i want > > > > > > > > perhaps my math is to weak...lol > > > > > > > > I simply will try it out. > > > > > > > > just giving more info: amateur-singer, half an hour of time, > > > > lives long from here. we recorded her voice, but in the lower > > > > parts she sang very quiet, so with normal compression i would > > > > compress 95% of what is correct only to add more gain to those > > > > parts. so i thought about this option instead. probably i > > > > should simply elevate volume in those part instead. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > > > > > > > that's not possible > > > > > > curve has to be like this: (hope this will be look the way it looks > > like here) > > > > . > > . > > . > > . > > . > > . > > . > > > > > > but like i said, none of the compressors i have installed can do > > this (and I have a lot) > > > > Well, normally, you might have a ratio like 3:1. What you are > demonstrating is a ratio of 1:3 or the like. I was suggesting a > ratio of -1:3 or so. I'm not sure if compressors have options to do > a 1:3 ratio, or -1:3 ratio, but they would look like you and I > suggested (respectively). > > Jeremy they can't....neither one neither the other but i had a look at your link from the tap-plugins, and it looks like in tap-dynamics i can create a function like this. thanks _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
