Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:48:07 -0500 Jeremy <jeremybubs@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > It seems like you would want to do normal compression with a very low > threshold (about the noise level) and a negative ratio. > > then you end up with a curve like > > \ > / \ > / \ > > Then you can add that into your original signal, to get something > approximating "upward compression". > > Also, perhaps the expander from tap-plugins might do what you want: > http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html > > <http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html>Jeremy > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Fabio <capoeirista@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:09:54 +0000 > > Q <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > > > upwards compression does it by boosting the volume of the quietest > > > signals -- compressing from the bottom up. This parallel > > > processing produces upwards compression as Joern expounded on my > > > original statement > > > > ok, thats what i want > > > > perhaps my math is to weak...lol > > > > I simply will try it out. > > > > just giving more info: amateur-singer, half an hour of time, lives > > long from here. we recorded her voice, but in the lower parts she > > sang very quiet, so with normal compression i would compress 95% of > > what is correct only to add more gain to those parts. so i thought > > about this option instead. probably i should simply elevate volume > > in those part instead. > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > that's not possible curve has to be like this: (hope this will be look the way it looks like here) . . . . . . . but like i said, none of the compressors i have installed can do this (and I have a lot) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
