Re: Which SATA drive? Size? [Was: Re: partition table]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/24/2010 05:49 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
On 12/25/2010 01:03 AM, Mark Knecht wrote
Or choose a different WD drive that doesn't have the problem. I went
for 500GB RAID Edition drives. Faster, WAY longer lifetime, all the
features required for RAID, but a bit more expensive and less space.
what on earth is "raid edition"? makes all my BS indicators flash red...
i can't imagine any special hardware feature "required for raid".

Different firmware. And spec'ed for 24x7 operation (maybe just tested better?). I think I remember some timeouts are different so that a drive will not "hang" an array while it tries to recalibrate or something like that.

Once I had 8 WD 500G "server level" drives in a raid array. Every once in a while one would just drop from the array. No reason. Went nuts trying to figure out what was wrong. A power cycle of the drive and it would work as new. Ended up being a firmware problem in the drive (!). WD's response was pathetic. Server drives, consumer drives, I think it is just a matter of having luck with the right fabrication batch and firmware - I never buy the latest model.

-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux