Re: Which SATA drive? Size? [Was: Re: partition table]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/25/2010 01:03 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:

> Or choose a different WD drive that doesn't have the problem. I went
> for 500GB RAID Edition drives. Faster, WAY longer lifetime, all the
> features required for RAID, but a bit more expensive and less space.

what on earth is "raid edition"? makes all my BS indicators flash red...
i can't imagine any special hardware feature "required for raid".

and like faberman remarked in another mail, i really can't see any
reason to buy disks of less than a terabyte these days, as increased
density will almost always imply increased throughput, at identical or
only very slightly increased power consumption.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux