On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:47:23 +0100 "rosea.grammostola" <rosea.grammostola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/02/2010 09:13 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote: > > On 12/02/2010 09:03 PM, fred wrote: > >> Folderol a Ãcrit : > >>> On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:44:20 +0100 > >>> Hartmut Noack<zettberlin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Am 02.12.2010 10:59, schrieb Philipp Ãberbacher: > >>>> > >>>>> Excerpts from Hartmut Noack's message of 2010-12-02 09:40:47 +0100: > >>>>> > >>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >>>>>> Hash: SHA1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am 01.12.2010 14:29, schrieb Batz: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Y-ellow All. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> [snip] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> So anyway, if any of this sound familiar and is easily fixed then I'd be > >>>>>>> over the moon to hear about it. Or alternatively, should I move on to > >>>>>>> try another distro? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> All I can say: a friend of mine here in Germ, who was heavily advocating > >>>>>> AVLinux last year, is now explicitly warning users NOT to use AVLinux 4.1. > >>>>>> Bad RT-Performance and other smaller issues he reports. Seems, AVL has > >>>>>> switched from Debian to Ubuntu. The very same step, that was one of the > >>>>>> last steps in the life of 64Studio.... > >>>>>> > >>>>> 64studio is dead? > >>>>> > >>>> Not officially dead yet, but smelling quite funny to me.... > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> I've been waiting for an update on this too :( > >>> > >>> However, the good news is that I've found I get very reasonable results using a > >>> minimal debian squeeze then pulling in a rt kernel and just the audio packages > >>> I want. > >>> > >>> If anyone is interested I can post the crib sheet I made as I installed it. > >>> > >>> > >> Please post it Folderol, it could be really nice when Squeeze goes to > >> stable ! > > > > By the way, they seems to be busy with a Multimedia blend for Debian. > > They can use some help and support afaik. You're welcome. > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/BitsFrom > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia > > > > > On 12/02/2010 09:49 PM, Folderol wrote: > > automake > > build-essential > > cmake > > cmake-curses > > dssi-dev > > fluid > > git-all > > libasound2-dev > > libfftw3-dev > > libjack-dev > > liblircclient-dev > > liblo-dev > > liblrdf0-dev > > libmxml-dev > > libqt4-dev > > libsamplerate0-dev > > libsndfile1-dev > > libxml++2.6-dev > > subversion > > xutils-dev > > zlib1g-dev > > > Hmm this is an interesting list... With these packages you can build > all/ most of the proaudio packages? > > Regards, > > > \r I think it certainly covers most stuff - it also covers most non-audio programs. I've used this list for fetching and compiling all of the following (at various times) when I've wanted to try newer versions: Audacity Audacious Hydrogen Lame Rosegarden Yoshimi -> now also needs libboost.dev ZynAddSubFX @allcoms You make some very good points, however don't forget this is just the crib sheet for producing my preferred setup. I've tried Thunar but just don't like it. Also ROX is closest to my Risc Os roots :) I'd forgotten to include alsactl store - certainly used it! Didn't know about apt-get build-dep ardour. I'm all for reducing lists of install libraries! -- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
