On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:12:14PM +0100, hermann wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.11.2010, 22:50 +0300 schrieb alex stone: > > Torben, a few questions. > > > > 1. Is the uncertainty over knowing which client is the offender a > > result of the client's jack code being less than optimal? (no offence > > to coders) > > > > 2.) Can jack, if advisable, take a bit of extra code to more clearly > > define which client is the offender? > > Jack apps could/need measure there own needed time per circle and > forward this information to jack if jack ask for it, may when CPU load > become to heavy, to give jack the possibility to decide witch one is the > ops. > > > > > 3.) Would a more robust client ID system solve the challenge of jack > > knowing 100% which client is the offender? i.e. Ardour is 001, > > jconvolver is 002, etc...... (I imply with this a central list at > > jackaudio. org, where jack capable clients are listed, and any coder > > that builds a jack app "officially" registers their app, and gets an > > app specific ID.) > > > > These questions are based on jack1, which i use. > > Whenever these questions come up, I always find myself singing this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBgewcFh-cg -ken _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
