Re: edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 07:28:04PM -0200, Fabio wrote:
> Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 18:37:30, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:
> 
> > For these tests the authors used 'audiophile' DVD-A recordings 
> > (mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
> > or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
> > transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results 
> > emerged from this:
> > 
> > 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> > reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> > versions. 
> > 
> > 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> > other versions of the same music released on CD. 
> 
> well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard

On the contrary, the test showed that the listeners could *not* hear
the difference.

Ciao,

-- 
FA

There are three of them, and Alleline.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux