Re: edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em quinta-feira 18 novembro 2010, às 18:37:30, fons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx escreveu:

> For these tests the authors used 'audiophile' DVD-A recordings 
> (mostly classical music and jazz IIRC), all of them 24-bit, 96
> or or 192 kHz, and had the listeners compare them to a version
> transcoded to CD standards (44.1 kHz, 16 bit). Two results 
> emerged from this:
> 
> 1. Nobody could hear any difference between the original recordings,
> reproduced using the best equipment available, and the transcoded
> versions. 
> 
> 2. Almost all listeners preferred the 'audiophile' recordings to
> other versions of the same music released on CD. 

well, you sure loose quality downsampling to 16bit, that's what they heard

they should have made the test only with diferent samplerates.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux