On 11/17/10 21:43, Eric Steinberg wrote: > I have never noticed any artifacts with downconverting of samplerate, except > on lower-quality Windows conversion software and early versions of Steinberg > Wavelab (no relation!). Upconversion is another story....is there a quick > and easy way to measure if conversion artifacts are present in an audio > file? "quick and easy" - I don't think so. http://src.infinitewave.ca/ provides a nice analysis of SRC code. Note that 'libsamplerate' is filed under 'secret rabbit code' there. best, robin > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eric Steinberg >> <eric.steinberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate? Just curious; I use >>> 44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 if I >> want >>> really high fidelity- but I've never used 88.2. >> >> its 2x 44.1 so that resampling to CD format is very artifact free, but >> you get the benefits of a higher SR. >> > _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
