Re: edirol fa101 on differant rate that 48k ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have never noticed any artifacts with downconverting of samplerate, except on lower-quality Windows conversion software and early versions of Steinberg Wavelab (no relation!).  Upconversion is another story....is there a quick and easy way to measure if conversion artifacts are present in an audio file?

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Eric Steinberg
<eric.steinberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Thomas, why do you use 88.2k as your samplerate?  Just curious; I use
> 44.1 if I'm going to CD, 48 if I'm doing pro video, and 96 or 192 if I want
> really high fidelity- but I've never used 88.2.

its 2x 44.1 so that resampling to CD format is very artifact free, but
you get the benefits of a higher SR.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux