Re: Plugin confused

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Chip VanDan wrote:

I recently was writing up an article for my site about my experiences
with VST capabilities in Linux, mostly focused on the use of FST and
learned that there was such thing as Linux Native VST format.  I was
about to begin compiling an addendum to my article but I discovered
more.  I already knew about LADSPA and knew a little about DSSI, but
in the process I learned a little about LV2 as well.  I'm trying to
find a source that can compare all these plugin formats side by side
and cannot seem to find one, so I might have to start compiling the
project myself, but I figured I'd ask the LAU list first.  Why do we
have all these different plugin formats, and what are the differences?
Are there any more worth mention that I haven't found yet?

If you're looking for a concise answer, you'll be hard-pressed to find one. This has plenty of links to the different tech... and each site usually has a FAQ about why they're different:

    http://linux-sound.org/plugins.html

Perhaps a too-simple way to view it is this:

    LADSPA is like VST (but no GUI ability),
        and only does effects.

    DSSI is like VSTi, and provides a way to
        make virtual instruments.

    LV2 is designed to be the end-all-be-all,
        extensible Free Plugin format.  It
        can be like VST, and VSTi, and more.

VST/VSTi's major problem is that the license does not work well with Free Software.

There's still a bit of friction between fans of DSSI and LV2.

   DSSI is a pragmatic solution to the need
   for instrument plugins that are analog to VSTi.
   However, if some other class of plugin comes
   along (VSTx), neither DSSI nor LADSPA will
   be able to handle it.

   LV2 is a solution that defines a basic plugin
   discovery mechanism... and its core features
   are to be implemented by /extensions/.  The
   strength is that LV2 can do "anything" (VST,
   VSTi, VSTx, french roast coffee)... just
   write an extension for it.  The weakness is
   that there is not (and will not be) a canonical
   set of extensions.  This has very confusing to
   a lot of people... and some even disagree
   with the philosophy.

HTH,
Gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [ALSA Devel]     [Sox Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux