On 15 November 2010 15:11, Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > LV2 represents some kind of version of the community's best-effort > attempt to define a better plugin API. It is hard to explain why LV2 > is so superior because its rooted in a feature that actually makes it > quite annoying for anyone who isn't instantly convinced that endless > extensibility is the right goal. But it allows for more or less > anything, assuming that both parties (the plugin and the host) can > agree on it. I followed you up to this paragraph. LADSPA started it, DSSI improved on it, and LV2 tried to be the end-all-be-all (the final solution) if I'm understanding correctly. Oh, and VAMP is sort of a side-show freak. But can you explain what you mean here, "assuming that both parties can agree on it"? -- Christopher "Chip" Van Dan http://www.van-dan.com _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
